Philosophy with Onbester

Comment on Stubblefield Pleads Guilty (3/22/18: updated sentencing information) by IGS

If the method was debunked in the 90s, then the articles should not have passed peer review in the first place. In that respect, we might agree that the articles ideally would not have been published if the literature is as you suggest. Apparently, the peer reviewers disagreed, and the standards ought to be different for retraction. Of course I agree that if this were analogous to a forged image that thereby misrepresents the underlying method, then retraction would be appropriate, but I think Kenny Read more [...]